Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Pros and Cons of Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Followed the definition by Wikipedia, Stare Decisis is the legal principle by which judges are obliged to obey the set-up precedents established by prior decisions. This means that the judges are bound to follow the decision made by other judges before them in dealing with cases with similar facts.

There are discussion on the pros and cons of such system. Advantages of such system are time saving and convenient. If a problem has already answer and been solved it is natural to reach the same conclusion. Besides that, the existence of stare decisis may prevent a judge from making a mistake that he might have made if he had been left on his own without any guidance. Injustice can be also prevented because the decision made is same with similar cases. The interests of justice also demand impartiality from the judge. This may be assured by the existence of a binding precedent, which he must follow unless it is distinguishable. If he tries to distinguish an indistinguishable case his attempt will be obvious. This can ensures impartiality of judge. The most important advantage of Doctrine of Stare Decisis is it provides greater certainty in the law. It allows persons to order their affairs and come to settlements with a certain amount of confidence.



The disadvantages of such system are it limits the development of law. This is because practical law is founded on experience but the scope for further experience is restricted if the first case is binding. Besides, existence of such system may make judges become thoughtless and over reliance on the doctrine of stare decisis. This is because of convenience of the doctrine and limitation of it. Thus, judges may not need to think beyond the limitation. Another disadvantage of stare decisis is there are simply too many precedents to be referred to. The citation of authority in court should be kept within reasonable bounds because it can be costly in terms of time and money. So, when there are too many precedents to be referred to, unnecessary efforts, time and money are wasted. Moreover, stare decisis is an application of argument from authority logical fallacy and can result in the preservation of cases decided wrongly.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

History of Law in Malaysia



Malaysian legal history can be traced back some six hundred years. There are three major periods that influence the current law of Malaysia. The first was the founding of the Melaka Sultanate at the beginning of the 15th century; second was the spread of Islam in the indigenous culture; and finally, and perhaps the most significant in modern Malaysia, was British colonial rule which brought with it constitutional government and the common law system.


Sultanate of Melaka

During the realm of the Sultanate, Melaka was an important trading port and the maintenance of law and order was crucial to its prosperity. The administration of justice was placed under the direct charge of the bendahara (or chief minister) who exercised both political and judicial functions. The temenggung (which is the commander of troops and police) was responsible for apprehending criminals, maintaining prisons and generally keeping the peace. The welfare of foreigners residing in the state was looked after by several shahbandars (habour masters and collectors of customs).
Little is known of the legal system in those days but it is generally accepted that the law administered then was a combination of Muslim law and the "Adat Temenggung" (patriarchal Malay customary law). The "Adat Temengung" was the law of the Sultan or the law ordained by the rulers and later adopted in the other regions of Peninsular Malaysia. It was the basis of the law as found in Malay legal digests compiled between the 15th and 19th centuries.
The formal legal text of traditional Melaka consisted of the Undang-Undang Melaka (Laws of Melaka), variously called the Hukum Kanun Melaka and Risalat Hukum Kanun, and the Undang-Undang Laut Melaka (the Maritime Laws of Melaka). The laws as written in the legal digests went through an evolutionary process. The legal rules that eventually evolved were shaped by three main influences, namely the early non-indigenous Hindu/Buddhist tradition, Islam and the indigenous "adat".
European and British Influence
When Melaka fell into the hands of the Portuguese from 1511 to 1641 and the Dutch from 1641 till 1786, the local people continued to practise Islamic laws and Malay customs. It could be said that the Portuguese and the Dutch laws made relatively little impact on the legal system as a whole other than the political and administrative structures.
In 1786, Britain acquired the island of Penarng, the first territory in Malaysia to fall into British hands. The main preoccupation of the British administrators during the first decades after the founding of Penang, was the maintenance of some form of order and to this end, local customs and law were allowed to continue but tempered by such portions of the English law as were considered just and expedient. Some judgements meted out may seem rather strange by today’s standard but it should be borne in mind that they merely reflected the harsh and often chaotic conditions of those pioneering days. Complaints and petitions were made over many years for a better system of administering justice. Finally, it came in the form of the Royal Charter of Justice of 1807. The Charter established the Court of Judicature of the Prince of Wales’ island (as Penang was then known) to exercise jurisdiction in all civil, criminal and ecclesiastical matters. It was interpreted by the courts as introducing to Penang the law of England as it stood in 1807 insofar as it was suitable to local conditions and circumstances.
When Penang, Singapore, which was founded by the British in 1819 along with Melaka, which fell to the British as a trade-off under the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824, formed the Straits Settlement in 1826, a new charter, the Charter of Justice was introduced. A new court called ‘The Court of Judicature of Prince of Wales’ Island, Singapore and Melaka" was created by this Charter. Penang in a sense had a second statutory reception of English law although it was the first for Singapore and Melaka. In one stroke of the pen, the Straits Settlements received a large dose of English law.
Despite the new Charter, the administration of justice was far from satisfactory. A third Charter of Justice was granted in 1855 which enabled the reorganisation of the court system. In 1867, when the administration of the Straits Settlements from India was transferred to the Colonial Office, the court system was reorganised once again. By Ordinance 5 of 1868, the Court of Judicature of Prince of Wales’ Island, Singapore and Melaka was abolished. A new court known as the Supreme Court of the Straits Settlements was established. In 1873, the Supreme Court was further reorganised under four judges – the Chief Justice, the Justice of Penang, the Senior Puisne Judge and the Junior Puisne Judge. The Court of Quarter Sessions was established as a criminal court and presided over by the Senior and Junior Puisne Judges in Singapore and Penang respectively. A Court of Appeal was also constituted. By then, the judiciary had slowly evolved into its modern form.
English commercial law was formally introduced into the Straits Settlements by Section 6 of the Civil Law Ordinance, 1878. This provision, as re-enacted in the Civil Law Act, 1956 (Revised 1972), is still applicable in Penang and Melaka.
English land law was specifically excluded by sub-section 2. The whole section of this Ordinance was incorporated into the Civil Law Ordinance of 1909 and later re-enacted as Section 5 of the Civil Law Ordinance (Chap. 42 of the 1936 Revised Edition). This was the legal situation in the Straits Settlements until its dissolution in 1946 following the formation of the Malayan Union.
The statutory introduction of English law to the Federated Malay States comprising the states of Perak, Selangor, Pahang and Negeri Sembilan occurred in 1937 with the introduction of the Civil Law Enactment, 1937. The Unfederated Malay States, consisting the states of Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu and Johor, became part of the Federation of Malaya in 1948 and the Civil Law (Extension) Ordinance, 1951, extended the application of the Enactment to these states.
Both enactments were replaced by the Civil Law Ordinance, 1956, which applied to all eleven states of the Federation. When Malaysia was established in 1963, it became necessary to harmonise the law to take effect in Sabah and Sarawak. The 1956 Ordinance was then superseded by the Civil Law Act, 1956 (revised 1972) which came into force on 1 April, 1972.


The article was adapted from Wikipedia - Malaysia Legal Law

Friday, February 19, 2010

Mind Mapping (Chapter 1)



For definition, please click here,

Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Malaysia Court Hierarchy

Monday, February 8, 2010

What do you think??


Case studies below are adapted from Mr Sonny's lecture slides.

Case 1

When driving his car home in Georgetown, Ryan called and talked with his wife through his mobile phone without the use of hands-free device. While talking, he lost control over his car and eventually hit a walking pedestrian.


Is Ryan liable under civil or criminal law? What should the pedestrian do to recover his injuries/loss? Should this case go to court, what will be Ryan’s right?

To understand the case study more, we define the meaning of civil and criminal law. By definition in Malaysian Law, criminal law codifies the various offences committed by individuals against the States such as murder, cheating, causing grievous hurt, theft and so fort. Meanwhile, civil law which is known as private law is the law which affects the rights and duties of individuals amongst themselves. It covers areas such as contract,tort and trust.

Thus, Ryan is liable under criminal law for causing grievious hurt by hitting the pedestrian while driving. The pedestrian can take legal action against Ryan and will be based on tort since the pedestrian is injured as a result of negligence of Ryan while driving. Tort is a civil wrong and is the breach of a general duty imposed by law and the important elements of a tort are that there must be an act or omission dine intentionally or negligently and there must be resultant damage which is not remote.

In addition, Ryan has the right to fair trial, right to jury trial, presumption of innocence which mean that Ryan is innocent unless proven guilty by the court, self indiscrimination, double jeopardy and so on.

Case 2

Geena runs an unregistered online investment portal from her home in KL where she managed to get people deposit money to her account. It was discovered that the investment was a scam and she attempted to flee with the money, only to be arrested in the airport by immigration officers because she held a fake passport.



Determine Geena’s liability: civil or criminal? What law(s) and statutes you think Geena has violated?


For case 2, Geena is actually liable under civil law based on the definition by Malaysian Law (see definition above) for running an unregistered online investment portal and taking illegal deposit. She violated the law of trusts and trustees by cheating the people to deposit money into illegal investment. By definition, a trust is an equitable obligation binding a person (who called a trustee) to deal with property over which he has control (which is called trust property) for the benefit of persons (who are called beneficiaries) of whom he may himself be one and any one of the beneficiaries may enforce the obligation.


Saturday, February 6, 2010

Underage sex??

Following a news in The Star Daily;

A MAN caught his 13-year-old niece having sex with her boyfriend at the stairwell of a condominium, reported Sinar Harian. The man was suspicious of the girl’s behaviour, as she constantly sneaked out of the house between 2am and 4am, and decided to spy on her. It is understood that the niece was staying with him as her mother was hospitalised. A police source said the uncle caught the couple in the act and brought the girl home. The source said the girl often met with her lover at the same stairwell between 2.30am and 4am.The case is being investigated as statutory rape as the girl is underaged. Petaling Jaya OCPD Asst Comm Arjunaidi Mohamed confirmed that a 20-year-old man had been detained to assist in investigations. "The suspect was arrested on Wednesday at the same condominium after a police report was lodged by the victim’s uncle,” he said.


The case shown that children nowadays seem to have been given no sense of real values and responsibilities about sex. So, who's to blame when it comes to sex before marriage? Shall we blame the parents for not educate and raise their children how to value themselves and understand the demands of parenthood, impact of sex before marriage? Or shall we blame the government for failure of our education system that could not educate young generation about the seriousness of such issue?

Our regulation system did enforce law for underage sex. Section 375 in Malaysia Law stated that age of consent for sex in Malaysia is 16 for both males and females. A man is said to convicted statutory rape if he has sexual intercourse with girl under 16 years old, with or without her consent.

The consequences???

Section 376 of the Penal Code states that whoever commits rape shall be punished with imprisonment for minimum term of five years and a maximum term of twenty years, and shall be liable to whipping.

For your information, a whip is cord or strap used to train animal (mostly).

Here a photo of a whip;
A very large, thick whip

Can you imagine the pain when it hit your buttock?? It is really terrible that flesh will be tear and blood is coming out from your buttock only after a first whip.



So, moral of the story to

GUYS!!

Never engage in sex with underage girl and do respect women.

GIRLS!!!

Please respect yourself and value yourself. Never give in to your boyfriend because you will regret it. If the guy really loves you, he will respect you and never ask you to engage in sex before marriage.

Credit to:
The Star Daily 
Wikipedia
Google Image
Women's Aid Organisation

Friday, January 22, 2010

First Posting Regarding Law

Hihi!! Dear reader, welcome to my blogspot and thanks for sparing some time reading my blog.. This is my first posting and hopefully i can upload more posts regarding law. So what is my thought regarding law?? Well, i admit that i am not good in memorizing thing and debating. Thus, law is definitely not my cup of coffee in my major selection. That why i am in financial engineering course and not LAW. 


But, it is essential to have a basic of law because we need it in our daily life. Living in this society, we are abide by law. While walking in the street, we are abide by the pedestrian law and traffic law. We can't cross road if the traffic light show red colour. We need to use the sky bridge if we wish to cross the busy road. Even when we buy thing from auntie from a mini store, we are abide by law. OPPS... there is just too many laws and regulation in our life. Endless lists to learn and what to do??? Just follow the law!!!!



Below is a trailer from a Singapore movie titled " Just Follow Law" for your entertainment. Hope you like it.









Last but not least, do leave comment if you have any thoughts to share with me..and sorry if my writing is jsut too bored.. Good news is you are not abide by law to read my blog.. thank you..